[TPIN] can't believe I have to/credibility/discussion/

[Michael Anderson]

I don't agree. I have never found anonymous posts to hold much weight.
Particularly if they are criticizing someone else. If you have something to
say, then put your name on it. Some forums don't allow anonymous posts
because it causes people to say things they wouldn't say face-to-face.

I have never required real name signatures and probably never will, but my
opinion is still the same. A criticizing post without a signature ain't
worth the 1 and 0's its written with.

MA


> From: Glenn Bengry <soundpretty at hotmail.com>
> Date: Mon, 6 Aug 2007 16:43:24 -0400
> To: Jeff Roberts <jeroberts at telus.net>, <tpin at tpin.okcu.edu>
> Subject: [TPIN] can't believe I have to/credibility/discussion/
> 
> 
> Jeff,
>  
>      It really isn't a credibility battle I don't think.  He can call Mike's
> behavior out if he chooses.  let the truth fall where it will fall.  It's not
> true because of who says its true.
>  
>    How about we take the names off of the posts and judge them on their merit,
> leaving the relative  name recognition out of it?  Would that remove the
> "bully" factor?  It would help.
>  
> glenn