[TPIN] Anonymous credibility

[Ellis Workman]

I hope our wise moderator is commending me for signing my
posts rather than condemning me for "getting people worked up for sport".

-Ellis

> I agree when it comes to valid discussion issues. However, when you are
> slamming someone undiplomatically and questioning their sincerity or
> credibility or even their opinion, hiding behind a pseudonym is lame and
> spineless and without merit. If you go on a discussion forum to cause
> trouble and get people worked up for the sport of it and least have the
> guts
> to sign your name like Ellis does. ;-)
>
> Boozo the clown is a troll. Plain and simple. A classic example too.
>
> MA
>
>
>> From: Glenn Bengry <soundpretty at hotmail.com>
>> Date: Mon, 6 Aug 2007 19:11:51 -0400
>> To: Boozo Destructo <boozo.destructo at gmail.com>, <tpin at tpin.okcu.edu>
>> Subject: [TPIN] Anonymous credibility
>>
>>
>> Mates,
>>
>>        My boy here has some strong points.  People on the other side of
>> the
>> argument have a formidable debate opponent, regardless of his name,
>> pedigree,
>> quality of his double C.
>>
>>  A good argument or point can stand on its own just like good science.
>> Scrutinize the statement.  I The idea of hiding implies that people need
>> to
>> know someone's name so they can attack the person or the person's
>> credibility.
>> If you got a problem with a statements facts or logic, then challenge
>> the
>> facts and logic.  If you have to resort to attacking the messenger,
>> then,
>> perhaps, your rebuttal is not as strong as you thought.
>>
>> glenn, I don't have a signature, bengry
>>
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> TPIN mailing list
> TPIN at tpin.okcu.edu
> http://tpin.okcu.edu/mailman/listinfo/tpin
>


-- 
=====
Ellis Workman, ARS KØELW
Grid EN33sx Olmsted County
Rochester, MN US