[TPIN] Anonymous credibility

[Daniel,John]

Boozo,
You aren't speaking art, or even sense, you are apeaking 
venom.  You could sign your posts however you like, it's 
still venom.  You can use whatever aruguments you want, 
it's still venom.  But we've all been there, so don't 
sweat it.
John


On Mon, 6 Aug 2007 18:05:42 -0700
  "Boozo Destructo" <boozo.destructo at gmail.com> wrote:
> So let me get this straight....the fact that you may 
>have never heard of
> something is the determining factor as to whether of not 
>their work has any
> merit?
> 
> So with that in mind, when walking through an art 
>gallery do you have to
> research each artist's credentials and experience before 
>you can make a
> judgment as to whether you like their painting or not? 
>And (gawd forbid)
> what if the painting wasn't signed?
> 
> That's just crazy-talk...
> 
> Boozo
> 
> 
> On 8/6/07, Fraser Hutchinson <fraserh at comcast.net> 
>wrote:
>>
>> That's fine for matters of fact and logic. For matters 
>>of taste, style,
>> and
>> REAL WORLD PRACICE, credibility does come into play. 
>> So, in this matter,
>> Mike Vax's experience and credentials carry far more 
>>weight to me that
>> someone I have never heard of and know nothing about.
>>
>> My $0.02,
>>
>> Fraser.
>>
>>
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> ----------------------------------------
>> Fraser Hutchinson
>> fraserh at comcast.net
>>
>> Trumpet, flugelhorn, keyboards, composer, arranger.
>>
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> ----------------------------------------
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: tpin-bounces at tpin.okcu.edu 
>>[mailto:tpin-bounces at tpin.okcu.edu] On
>> Behalf Of Glenn Bengry
>> Sent: Monday, August 06, 2007 4:12 PM
>> To: Boozo Destructo; tpin at tpin.okcu.edu
>> Subject: [TPIN] Anonymous credibility
>>
>>
>> Mates,
>>
>>        My boy here has some strong points.  People on 
>>the other side of
>> the
>> argument have a formidable debate opponent, regardless 
>>of his name,
>> pedigree, quality of his double C.
>>
>> A good argument or point can stand on its own just like 
>>good science.
>> Scrutinize the statement.  I The idea of hiding implies 
>>that people need
>> to
>> know someone's name so they can attack the person or the 
>>person's
>> credibility.  If you got a problem with a statements 
>>facts or logic, then
>> challenge the facts and logic.  If you have to resort to 
>>attacking the
>> messenger, then, perhaps, your rebuttal is not as strong 
>>as you thought.
>>
>> glenn, I don't have a signature, bengry
>>
>>
>>
>> > > I agree, no worthwhile artistic endeavour has EVER 
>>been accomplished
>> by>
>> anyone with a pseudonym.> > Not from Frederick 
>>Austerlitz> or Anthony
>> Benedetto> or Gordon Sumner> or Walter Ferguson> or 
>>William Chiase> or
>> Frances Gumm> or Robert Allen Zimmerman> or Erik Weiss> 
>>or even Paul
>> Reubens> > Fakes, phonies, every one.> > Aum,> Boozo> >
>> _______________________________________________
>> TPIN mailing list
>> TPIN at tpin.okcu.edu
>> http://tpin.okcu.edu/mailman/listinfo/tpin
>>
>>
> _______________________________________________
> TPIN mailing list
> TPIN at tpin.okcu.edu
> http://tpin.okcu.edu/mailman/listinfo/tpin