[TPIN] Bach stuff

[Jon]

It's true that Bach's been inconsistent in the past (better now), but all 
the consistency in the world won't help if the basic horn is lousy. Played a 
gig the other night; the guy playing second had a new Yamaha Chicago C. 
After trying my horn (modified by Akright), he got on the phone with a 
friend back east, told him about the Bach, and now they're both going to 
Dillon's and Washington Music to buy horns.

Why? Did the Bach really play that much better than the Yamaha? Maybe a 
little, but the sound, dude, the sound! That's what it's all about.

Jon

----- Original Message ----- 
From: <Vaxtrpts at aol.com>
To: <manderson at okcu.edu>; <tpin at tpin.okcu.edu>
Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2007 12:40 PM
Subject: [TPIN] Bach stuff


>
> In a message dated 12/17/2007 5:41:25 P.M. Pacific Standard Time,
> manderson at okcu.edu writes:
>
> Logic  would support you conclusions on this, but you on essential element 
> to
> the  equation. This is BACH we are talking about. :-)
>
> MA *ducking for  cover*
>
 <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<
> Don't  duck for cover at all, Mike.  Truer words were never spoken.  The
> complete inadequacy of their numbering system, as well as the 
> inconsistency of
> their products, has been why I have never been a Bach fan.
> Mike Vax