[TPIN] Bach stuff

[Orion Development Corp - D. Arndt]

That's it.  The Bach sound is hard to beat - especially for legit/orchestral 
stuff, but true generally across the board.  

Even with the inconsistencies in the mouthpieces, when you get one you like, 
it's got a feel and core to the sound that is hard to part with.  (That being 
said, I'm finding myself being drawn more and more to GR pieces... at least 
this month... <g>)

On Tue, 18 Dec 2007 13:53:06 -0800, Jon wrote
> It's true that Bach's been inconsistent in the past (better now),
>  but all the consistency in the world won't help if the basic horn 
> is lousy. Played a gig the other night; the guy playing second had a 
> new Yamaha Chicago C. After trying my horn (modified by Akright), he 
> got on the phone with a friend back east, told him about the Bach, 
> and now they're both going to Dillon's and Washington Music to buy horns.
> 
> Why? Did the Bach really play that much better than the Yamaha? 
> Maybe a little, but the sound, dude, the sound! That's what it's all 
> about.
> 
> Jon
> 
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: <Vaxtrpts at aol.com>
> To: <manderson at okcu.edu>; <tpin at tpin.okcu.edu>
> Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2007 12:40 PM
> Subject: [TPIN] Bach stuff
> 
> >
> > In a message dated 12/17/2007 5:41:25 P.M. Pacific Standard Time,
> > manderson at okcu.edu writes:
> >
> > Logic  would support you conclusions on this, but you on essential 
element 
> > to
> > the  equation. This is BACH we are talking about. :-)
> >
> > MA *ducking for  cover*
> >
>  <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<
> > Don't  duck for cover at all, Mike.  Truer words were never spoken.  The
> > complete inadequacy of their numbering system, as well as the 
> > inconsistency of
> > their products, has been why I have never been a Bach fan.
> > Mike Vax
> 
> _______________________________________________
> TPIN mailing list
> TPIN at tpin.okcu.edu
> http://tpin.okcu.edu/mailman/listinfo/tpin