[TPIN] Bach stuff

[Brian D. Moon]

Man, 72's are tanks.


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Jon" <jon at yakatus.com>
To: <tpin at tpin.okcu.edu>
Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2007 5:48 PM
Subject: Re: [TPIN] Bach stuff


> The normal weight 72 is generally the Bach of choice for classical these 
> days. Great sound and response.
>
> Jon
>
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Orion Development Corp - D. Arndt" <darndt at oriongate.net>
> To: <Vaxtrpts at aol.com>; <jon at yakatus.com>; <tpin at tpin.okcu.edu>
> Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2007 2:41 PM
> Subject: Re: [TPIN] Bach stuff
>
>
>> I've been trying non-Bach horns for the past 6 months or so, to move to
>> something lighter, brighter and more 'open'.  (My Bb has always been a 
>> Bach
>> 180 ML with a 37 bell, and the older I get, the tigher it feels!)
>>
>> The last horn I tried was a Bach 180 Lightweight with a 72 bell.  It 
>> really
>> turned my head around about Bachs for commercial use.  It was as easy 
>> blowing
>> as a lot of the other horns I tried (Getzen, Kanstul, Yamaha,...) - felt 
>> very
>> open and responsive in all registers.  Playing softly, it seemed nice and
>> warm/round - while playing open, it had a lot of the sizzle you would 
>> look
>> for in a commercial type horn.
>
> _______________________________________________
> TPIN mailing list
> TPIN at tpin.okcu.edu
> http://tpin.okcu.edu/mailman/listinfo/tpin