[TPIN] A Can Of Worms

[Achias1 at mchsi.com]

Nanette,

I've been using both for the reasons that you already gave. My older horns get 495 and newer ones get 
pro, but if pro was all that was available, that would be no problem for me. I still have a couple bottles of 
495 sitting around and am willing to go to pro when those run out (if ever).

Dave


> The only difference is a slightly heavier viscosity with the BiNaK 495. 
> This works well with vintage horns, rental instruments that are kept in 
> storage for long periods and also, large bore instruments such as Euph's and 
> Tuba's.
> Other then that, they have the same lubrication capabilities.
> The difference in viscosity is so small that I have been thinking of just 
> selling BiNaK PRO.  Any thoughts on this?
> 
>      Nanette L. Kappus, Tribologist
>                  www.binak.com
>             binak at rochester.rr.com
> "Everyone dies. Not everyone truly lives."
>                     William Wallace
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Jeff Briddle" <jbriddle at hotmail.com>
> To: "Doc D'Errico" <doc at derrico.net>; "'Lenny Buttitta, Jr.'" 
> <k6mms at yahoo.com>
> Cc: "'TPIN'" <tpin at tpin.okcu.edu>
> Sent: Friday, January 19, 2007 6:53 AM
> Subject: RE: [TPIN] A Can Of Worms
> 
> 
> What an awesome vote of confidence for Binak.  I just ordered my first 
> bottle of Binak 495.  What's the difference between 495 and Pro?  Can't be 
> the price because Nanette includes shipping within the US.
> 
> Jeff_______________________________________________
> TPIN mailing list
> TPIN at tpin.okcu.edu
> http://tpin.okcu.edu/mailman/listinfo/tpin
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> TPIN mailing list
> TPIN at tpin.okcu.edu
> http://tpin.okcu.edu/mailman/listinfo/tpin